Talk:Gay beat - Wikipedia

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Gay beat is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Move to Gay beat

[edit]

I created the article, and I don't think it should be moved to public sex because it describes a specific type of public sex (the other article is too general), using a specific word that is likely to be typed into the search bar (beat) if someone was looking for information. I created the article because I searched WP for 'beat' in this context but nada.

To my knowledge, the word 'beat' used in this context is less common anywhere else ('cruising ground' seems far more common in the US and UK), and in Australia is the only word used to describe these places. So, I think public sex should link to this article, but it should remain distinct. I also intend to expand on it (hence the {stub}) when I've got time to do some more research. Cheers, Natgoo 15:58, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've had a play on google using "gay beats" and Australian articles are most prominent in this context, 'gay beat' seems to refer to journalists covering gay issues/ events in the US. I'd be happy for it to move to Gay beat if people added to it - I know a lot of study has been conducted in this area, so there should be some people around to expand it :) Natgoo 20:04, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think renaming to gay beat would be a problem, but I think the word "beat" needs to be in the title as this is a likely search term (heck, it bought me here. The intro could explain that it is mainly an Australian term, synonymous with cottaging?

Will add to when I get a chance.

Since there didn't seem to be any objection, I've moved this page to Gay beat. --Lox (t,c) 17:32, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Against the law in all States and Territories"... of Australia? This should be specified. - Nessa Ancalimë ♥ (talk) 22:23, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gay beat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:03, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]